Skip to main content
Contribution to Book
International relations theory and Chinese philosophy
Chinese engagements: Regional issues with global implications
  • Rosita Dellios, Bond University
Date of this Version
Document Type
Book Chapter
Publication Details

Submitted version available for download.

Published version citation.

Dellios, R. (2011). International relations theory and Chinese philosophy. In B. McCormick & J. H. Ping (Eds.), Chinese engagements: Regional issues with global implications (pp. 45-65). Robina: Bond University Press.

Access the publisher's website.

2011 HERDC submission. FoR code: 160607

© Copyright Rosita Dellios, 2011

Extract:Insights drawn from a comparison between International Relations theory and Chinese philosophy provide a timely vantage point for ‘Chinese Engagements’ at this historical juncture of China’s emergence as a twenty-first century global power. In this chapter, after a brief historical background, three major International Relations theoretical perspectives are examined: neorealism, neoliberal institutionalism, and social constructivism. In addition, hegemonic stability theory and global governance are selected as concepts relevant to the globalised political world. The theory of correlativity is discussed as an introduction to Chinese philosophy and this is followed by Daoism, Confucianism and Buddhism as the tripartite philosophical foundations of the Chinese tradition. Legalism and Mohism are two added perspectives that help elucidate the polarities of Chinese philosophy. Conclusions are drawn in terms of mutuality between the two, soft power and the correlative nature of the global governance phenomenon.
Citation Information
Rosita Dellios. "International relations theory and Chinese philosophy" 1stRobinaChinese engagements: Regional issues with global implications (2011) p. 45 - 65
Available at: