Skip to main content
Article
Ineffective and Inequitable: The Section 265(a) Interest Disallowance
Wake Forest Law Review
  • Ronald W. Blasi, Georgia State University College of Law
  • C. James Judson
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-1990
Abstract

This article argues for the repeal of Code section 265(a) because it is ineffective, creates horizontal inequities, and represents overwhelming administrative enforcement difficulties. Consistent with the repeal of the section should be a repeal of Code section 103. The market for municipal banks will operate more efficiently without these Code sections.

Comments

External Links
Westlaw
HeinOnline
SSRN

Citation Information
Ronald W. Blasi & C. James Judson, Ineffective and Inequitable: The Section 265(a) Interest Disallowance, 25 Wake Forest L. Rev. 811 (1990).