Skip to main content
Article
Changing Antimalarial Drug Sensitivities in Uganda.
Natural Sciences and Mathematics | Faculty Scholarship
  • Stephanie A. Rasmussen, Department of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Dominican University of California
  • Frida G. Ceja, Department of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Dominican University of California
  • Melissa D. Conrad, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
  • Patrick K. Tumwebaze, Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration
  • Oswald Byaruhanga, Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration
  • Thomas Katairo, Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration
  • Samuel L. Nsobya, Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration
  • Philip J. Rosenthal, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
  • Roland A. Cooper, Department of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Dominican University of California
Department
Natural Sciences and Mathematics
Document Type
Article
Source
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Publication Date
12-1-2017
Abstract

Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) has demonstrated excellent efficacy for the treatment and prevention of malaria in Uganda. However, resistance to both components of this regimen has emerged in Southeast Asia. The efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine, the first-line regimen to treat malaria in Uganda, has also been excellent, but continued pressure may select for parasites with decreased sensitivity to lumefantrine. To gain insight into current drug sensitivity patterns, ex vivo sensitivities were assessed and genotypes previously associated with altered drug sensitivity were characterized for 58 isolates collected in Tororo, Uganda, from subjects presenting in 2016 with malaria from the community or as part of a clinical trial comparing DP chemoprevention regimens. Compared to community isolates, those from trial subjects had lower sensitivities to the aminoquinolines chloroquine, monodesethyl amodiaquine, and piperaquine and greater sensitivities to lumefantrine and mefloquine, an observation consistent with DP selection pressure. Compared to results for isolates from 2010 to 2013, the sensitivities of 2016 community isolates to chloroquine, amodiaquine, and piperaquine improved (geometric mean 50% inhibitory concentrations [IC50] = 248, 76.9, and 19.1 nM in 2010 to 2013 and 33.4, 14.9, and 7.5 nM in 2016, respectively [P < 0.001 for all comparisons]), the sensitivity to lumefantrine decreased (IC50 = 3.0 nM in 2010 to 2013 and 5.4 nM in 2016 [P < 0.001]), and the sensitivity to dihydroartemisinin was unchanged (IC50 = 1.4 nM). These changes were accompanied by decreased prevalence of transporter mutations associated with aminoquinoline resistance and low prevalence of polymorphisms recently associated with resistance to artemisinins or piperaquine. Antimalarial drug sensitivities are changing in Uganda, but novel genotypes associated with DP treatment failure in Asia are not prevalent.

PubMed ID
28923866
Rights
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology
Citation Information
Stephanie A. Rasmussen, Frida G. Ceja, Melissa D. Conrad, Patrick K. Tumwebaze, et al.. "Changing Antimalarial Drug Sensitivities in Uganda." Vol. 61 Iss. 12 (2017) ISSN: 1098-6596
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/roland_cooper/57/