On 'the Denial of Bivalence is Absurd'Australasian Journal of Philosophy (2003)
Timothy Williamson, in various places, has put forward an argument that is supposed to show that denying bivalence is absurd. This paper is an examination of the logical force of this argument, which is found wanting.
Citation InformationF. J. Pelletier and Robert J. Stainton. "On 'the Denial of Bivalence is Absurd'" Australasian Journal of Philosophy Vol. 81 Iss. 3 (2003)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/robertstainton/80/