A ‘sampled’ account of organisation: being a de-authored, reflexive parody of organisation writingStudies in Cultures, Organizations and Societies
AbstractTo abstract is to remove, take away ... to steal... Something taken out, summary, epitome ... essence2 Thus: This supplementarity to the text below ‘steals’ from it; it pretends to ‘abstract’ the ‘essence’ of it and re-present it here. The text also ‘steals’ extensively from other texts – an inevitability parodied by the device of ‘sampling’ – which is explicit theft. This supplement as complement gives a flavour of the essence of the text and reflexively models its form: This is an open text. It is writerly. This text plays [with] the academic game [just gaming]. It is a parody. the structure ‘preface–text’ becomes open at both ends. The text has no stable identity, stable origin… each act of reading ‘the text’ is a preface to the next. The reading of a self-professed preface is no exception to this rule1 This text is fragmentary. Is a heterogloss that struggles against its own monologic linearity. This text is an inscription on the degree zero. This text appropriates the undecidable. This text organises. This text is Organisation.
Westwood, RI 1999, 'A ‘sampled’ account of organisation: being a de-authored, reflexive parody of organisation writing', Studies in Cultures, Organizations and Societies, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 195-233.
Published version available from: