![](https://d3ilqtpdwi981i.cloudfront.net/FZEIjUh6TTGaQXgy6ZcbvkYWiDQ=/425x550/smart/https://bepress-attached-resources.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/91/06/ea/9106ea92-da3c-405b-99aa-5fed948f5bd9/thumbnail_8d9b31a5-136b-4b9d-bd7a-6c6d750b7932.jpg)
In the gradient method, soil heat flux density at a known depth G is determined as the product of soil thermal conductivity λ and temperature T gradient. While measuring λ in situ is difficult, many field studies readily support continuous, long-term monitoring of soil T and water content θ in the vadose zone. In this study, the performance of the gradient method is evaluated for estimating near-surface G using modeled λ and measured T. Hourly λ was estimated using a model that related λ to θ, soil bulk density ρb, and texture at 2-, 6-, and 10-cm depths. Soil heat flux Gm was estimated from modeled λ and measured T gradient (from thermocouples). The Gm results were evaluated with heat flux data GHP determined using independent measured λ and T gradient from heat-pulse probes. The λ model performed well at the three depths with 3.3%–7.4% errors. The Gm estimates were similar to GHP (agreed to within 15.1%), with the poorest agreement at the 2-cm soil depth, which was caused mainly by the relatively greater variability in ρb. Accounting for temporal variations in ρb (with core method) improved the accuracies of λ and Gm at the 2-cm depth. Automated θ monitoring approaches (e.g., time domain reflectometry), rather than gravimetric sampling, captured the temporal dynamics of near-surface λ and G well. It is concluded that with continuous θ and T measurements, the λ model–based gradient method can provide reliable near-surface G. Under conditions of soil disturbance or deformation, including temporally variable ρb, data improves the accuracy of G data.
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/robert-horton/144/
This article is published as Peng, Xiaoyang, Joshua Heitman, Robert Horton, and Tusheng Ren. "Determining near-surface soil heat flux density using the gradient method: A thermal conductivity model–based approach." Journal of Hydrometeorology 18, no. 8 (2017): 2285-2295. doi: 10.1175/JHM-D-16-0290.1. Posted with permission.