Skip to main content
Contribution to Book
Judicial Decision Making About Forensic Mental Health Evidence
Special Topics in Forensic Practice (2010)
  • Richard E. Redding
  • Daniel C. Murrie
Abstract
Judges play a central role in decision making in the justice system. This chapter reviews the extant empirical research on judicial decision making in criminal, juvenile, and civil cases. We discuss judges’ decision making about forensic mental health evidence introduced in these cases, judicial receptivity to various kinds of evidence, and their understanding of clinical and scientific evidence as well as the ways they make rulings about such evidence. We focus on decision making at the trial court level, in those arenas that are most relevant to the forensic mental health practitioner (psychiatrist, psychologist, or social worker) who is called on to provide testimony to the courts.
Keywords
  • Judges,
  • Decision Making,
  • Forensic Evidence,
  • Mental Health Evidence,
  • Mental Health Experts
Publication Date
2010
Citation Information
Richard E. Redding and Daniel C. Murrie. "Judicial Decision Making About Forensic Mental Health Evidence" Special Topics in Forensic Practice (2010)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/richard_redding/15/