Skip to main content
Article
Clinical Judgment as Fantasied Identification
Psychological Reports (1970)
  • Richard H. Dana, Portland State University
  • Anne L. Handzlik
Abstract

10 judges had previously used case history material to generate trait-adjectives and psychological reports. Each judge was given 2 sets of 12 adjectives each, half of consensual and half of personal origin. Both lists were ranked for self-descriptiveness. Personal adjectives were significantly favored for self-description, especially by female judges for the female case material. Social desirability effects were not present.

Keywords
  • Psychological reports
Publication Date
1970
Citation Information
Richard H. Dana and Anne L. Handzlik. "Clinical Judgment as Fantasied Identification" Psychological Reports Vol. 26 Iss. 2 (1970)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/richard_dana/24/