Skip to main content
Article
Musculoskeletal pain stakeholder engagement and partnership development: determining patient-centered research priorities
Research Involvement and Engagement
  • Jason M Beneciuk, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida USA.
  • Dorothy Verstandig, Patient partner, Jacksonville, Florida USA.
  • Chuck Taylor, Patient partner, Jacksonville, Florida USA.
  • Doug Scott, Patient partner, Jacksonville, Florida USA.
  • Joan Levin, Patient partner, Jacksonville, Florida USA.
  • Raine Osborne, University of North Florida
  • Joel E Bialosky, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida USA.
  • Trevor A Lentz, Duke Clinical Research Institute and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina USA.
  • Tava Buck, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida USA.
  • Anita L Davis, Brooks Rehabilitation Behavioral Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida USA.
  • Christina Harder, Brooks Rehabilitation, Jacksonville, Florida USA.
  • Monika B Beneciuk, Brooks Rehabilitation, Jacksonville, Florida USA.
  • Virgil Wittmer, Brooks Rehabilitation Behavioral Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida USA.
  • James Sylvester, Community partner, Jacksonville, Florida USA.
  • Robert Rowe, Brooks Rehabilitation, Institute of Higher Learning, Jacksonville, Florida USA.
  • David McInnes, St. Vincent's Family Medicine Residency Program, Ascension St. Vincent's, Jacksonville, Florida USA.
  • Tad P Fisher, Florida Physical Therapy Association, Tallahassee, Florida USA.
  • Lisa McGarrie, Georgia Health Policy Center, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2020
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal (MSK) pain is a global public health problem with increased societal burden. Increased attention has focused toward patient and other stakeholder perspectives when determining future MSK pain research priorities, however infrastructure and capacity building within the community are needed for individuals and organizations to participate in patient-centered outcomes research. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe our collaborative experiences with several MSK pain stakeholders and processes to identify a top priority research topic. METHODS: Lunch meetings and formalized workshops were used to develop infrastructure for engaging patients and other stakeholders with early capacity building for partners to identify MSK pain research ideas based on their personal experiences. Additional capacity building and engagement through literature searching further prepared partners to contribute informed decisions about MSK pain research topics and subsequent selection of an important research question. RESULTS: Several key deliverables (e.g., Governance Document, Communication Plan) were developed and completed over the course of this project to provide partnership structure. Other key deliverables included a list of preliminary comparative effectiveness research ideas ( = 8) and selection of shared decision making for MSK pain as the top priority research topic with patient partners identifying pain self-efficacy as an important outcome domain. CONCLUSIONS: Our patient partners provided the catalyst for identifying shared decision making as a high priority research topic based on a wide spectrum of stakeholder perspectives and unique experiences. Patient partners were primarily identified using a single rehabilitation health system and clinician partners were heavily weighted by physical therapists which may have introduced selection bias.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.1186/s40900-020-00192-8
PubMed ID
32514375
E-ISSN
2056-7529
Language
eng
Citation Information
Beneciuk JM, Verstandig D, Taylor C, Scott D, Levin J, Osborne R, Bialosky J, Lentz T, Buck T, Davis A, Harder C, Beneciuk M, Wittmer V, Sylvester J, Rowe R, McInnes D, Fisher TP. McGarrie. Musculoskeletal pain stakeholder engagement and partnership development: Determining patient-centered research priorities. Research Involvement and Engagement. 2020;6:28. DOI:19.1186/s40900-020- 00192-8