Skip to main content
Article
Response to Working Group on Chapter 2 of the Proposed Restatement of Employment Law: Putting the Restatement in its Place
UF Law Faculty Publications
  • Rachel Arnow-Richman, University of Florida Levin College of Law
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2010
Abstract

Like most of the contributors to this symposium, I come to bury the Restatement, not to praise it. A fair reading of the ALI’s proposed Chapter 2, on termination and employment at will, reveals a document deeply, if not irretrievably, flawed in both its conception and execution. Principal among my complaints is that the draft neither presents an integrated approach to contractual terms of employment, nor takes a position on the appropriateness of contract as a vehicle for creating employment terms. Thus, in the most benign terms, the draft repackages the common law, adding nothing of value in the process.

Citation Information
Rachel Arnow-Richman, Response to Working Group on Chapter 2 of the Proposed Restatement of Employment Law: Putting the Restatement in its Place, 13 Em. Rts. & Emp. Pol'y J. 143 (2010)