|Present||Professor and Faculty Director, Rappaport Center for Law and Public Policy, Boston College Law School|
- Fall 2018: Evidence, Prosecutorial Ethics
- Spring 2019: Criminal Law
R. Michael Cassidy
Professor of Law and Law School Fund Scholar
Boston College Law School
885 Centre Street
Newton Center, MA 02459
Criminal Law and Procedure (13)
Catholic Social Thought and Criminal Justice Reform Journal of Catholic Social Thought, Forthcoming (2018)
Professor Cassidy examines the criminal justice reform movement in the United States through the lens of Catholic social thought. In particular, he focuses on God’s gift of redemption and the Gospels’ directives that we love ...
Silencing Grand Jury Witnesses Indiana Law Journal (2016)
The investigations of local police officers for causing the deaths of unarmed civilians in Ferguson, Missouri and Staten Island, New York have generated significant national discourse about the fairness and transparency of grand jury proceedings. ...
Promoting Diversity in the Criminal Justice System Boston Bar Journal (2015)
The decisions of grand juries in Missouri and New York not to indict police officers responsible for shooting unarmed black men has sparked intense debate in this country about racial disparities in our criminal justice ...
The Model Penal Code’s Wrong Turn: Renunciation as a Defense to Criminal Conspiracy Florida Law Review (2012)
While the Model Penal Code was certainly one the most influential developments in criminal law in the past century, the American Law Institute (ALI) took a seriously wrong turn by recognizing a defense of “renunciation” ...
Plea Bargaining, Discovery, and the Intractable Problem of Impeachment Disclosures Vanderbilt Law Review (2011)
In a criminal justice system where guilty pleas are the norm and trials the rare exception, the issue of how much discovery a defendant is entitled to before allocution has immense significance. This article examines ...
Legal Ethics (11)
Undue Influence: A Prosecutor's Role in Parole Proceedings Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Forthcoming (2018)
Professor Cassidy explores what it means for a prosecutor to act as a “minister of justice” in the context of parole proceedings. He argues that prosecutors should not perceive themselves as zealous advocates in what ...
Professional Responsibility in Focus (2017)
Professional Responsibility in Focus offers a comprehensive, practice-oriented approach to the legal and ethical rules governing lawyers and judges. By providing real world scenarios throughout the text, this casebook gives students numerous opportunities to apply ...
(Ad)ministering Justice: A Prosecutor's Ethical Duty to Support Sentencing Reform Loyola University of Chicago Law Journal (2014)
This article stakes out an ethical argument in favor of prosecutorial leadership on sentencing reform. Prosecutors have a duty as “ministers of justice” to go beyond seeking appropriate conviction and punishment in individual cases, and ...
Some Reflections on Ethics and Plea Bargaining: An Essay in Honor of Fred Zacharias San Diego Law Review (2011)
In this article the author explores what it means for a prosecutor to “do justice” in a plea bargaining context. Although the vast majority of criminal cases in the United States are resolved by guilty ...
The Prosecutor and the Press: Lessons (Not) Learned from the Mike Nifong Debacle Law and Contemporary Problems (2008)
Using the Mike Nifong disciplinary case in North Carolina as a focal point, the author examines the disciplinary rules pertaining to public speech by attorneys during the pendency of an adjudicatory proceeding. The author argues ...
Character and Context: What Virtue Theory Can Teach Us About a Prosecutor's Ethical Duty to "Seek Justice." Notre Dame Law Review (2006)
A critical issue facing the criminal justice system today is how best to promote ethical behavior by public prosecutors. The legal profession has left much of a prosecutor’s day-to-day activity unregulated, in favor of a ...
'Soft Words of Hope:' Giglio, Accomplice Witnesses, and the Problem of Implied Inducements Northwestern University Law Review (2004)
Many scholars have criticized the government's practice of rewarding accomplices with leniency in exchange for their cooperation in criminal cases, because such practice provides the accomplice with a tremendous inducement to fabricate in order to ...
Toward a More Independent Grand Jury: Recasting and Enforcing the Prosecutor’s Duty to Disclose Exculpatory Evidence Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics (2000)
This Article analyzes the Supreme Court’s decision in Williams, in which the Court struck down an attempt by the Tenth Circuit to impose an obligation on federal prosecutors to disclose substantial exculpatory evidence to the ...
Reconsidering Spousal Privileges after Crawford American Journal of Criminal Law (2006)
In this article the author explores how domestic violence prevention efforts have been adversely impacted by the Supreme Court’s new “testimonial” approach to the confrontation clause. Examining the Court’s trilogy of cases from Crawford to ...