Skip to main content
Article
Good and Bad Group Performance: Same Process—Different Outcomes
Peer Reviewed Articles
  • R. S. Tindale, Loyola University Chicago
  • Christine M. Smith, Grand Valley State University
  • Amanda Dykema-Engblade, Northeastern Illinois University
  • Katharina Kluwe, Loyola University Chicago
Publication Date
1-1-2012
Keywords
  • group performance
Disciplines
Abstract
Much of the research on small group performance shows that groups tend to outperform individuals in most task domains. However, there is also evidence that groups sometimes perform worse than individuals, occasionally with severe negative consequences. Theoretical attempts to explain such negative performance events have tended to point to characteristics of the group or the group process that were different than those found for better performing groups. We argue that typical group processes can be used to explain both good and bad group performance in many instances. Results from a pair of experiments focusing on two different task domains are reported and used to support our arguments.
Comments

Tindale, R. Scott, Christine M. Smith, Amanda Dykema-Engblade, and Katharina Kluwe. "Good and Bad Group Performance: Same Process—Different Outcomes." Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 15, no. 5 (2012): 603-618.

Citation Information
R. S. Tindale, Christine M. Smith, Amanda Dykema-Engblade and Katharina Kluwe. "Good and Bad Group Performance: Same Process—Different Outcomes" (2012)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/r-tindale/4/