We study production capacity utilization and emission permit utilization in a model where firms jointly produce a valued good and an environmental bad, pollution. Firms are ex ante identical but experience random productivity shocks after factor employment. A regulator imposes a cap-and-trade policy to control pollution emissions. Trade in emission permits entails transactions costs which follow two specifications: constant per unit trading costs or fixed trading costs. Under constant per unit trading costs, the equilibrium outcome depends only on the total unit trading costs; the incidence of costs borne by buyers and sellers does not matter. Under fixed costs, both buyers' and sellers' costs matter. Under proportional costs permit trade always occurs, with either full or partial market clearing, as long as the total trading costs are below the permit trade surplus. With fixed costs, trade is either partial or non-existent. The implication is that firms fully utilize their production capacity for a range of proportional trading costs; capacity is never fully utilized under fixed costs. Under proportional costs, trade is impeded most, even with small costs, when the emission cap is either relatively high or low. There exists a non-monotonic relationship between the aggregate emissions cap and a lower bound for trading costs that obstruct or preclude trade. Under fixed costs, a similar relationship between emission cap and the cost threshold that precludes trade holds only if the output variance is exogenously fixed. Otherwise, the higher the emission cap the higher is this cost threshold. In contrast to proportional costs where capacity utilization decreases with productivity variance, the result is the opposite under fixed costs.