Skip to main content
Article
A Content Analysis of Criminal Justice Policy Review, 1986-2008
Criminal Justice Policy Review
  • Philip M Stinson, Bowling Green State University - Main Campus
  • Jennifer L Huck, IUP
  • Jason D Spraitz, IUP
Document Type
Article
Abstract

Academic disciplines have been characterized as static institutions that do not change or conform to outside forces. Abbott (1999) and Silbey (2000) have discussed this issue in relation to how the history of refereed journals in the social sciences can provide information on department, institution, and disciplinary changes that often wear a false guise of continuity. This paper analyzes the content of Criminal Justice Policy Review by replicating the methodology Silbey (2000) used to study the content of Law & Society Review in terms of editorship, authorship, article contents, method and mode of research, and article topics. The results indicate that, although changes in the content of Criminal Justice Policy Review over time may be small, they exist and most correspond with changes in the department, institution, and discipline. Changes in journal content also appear to have been influenced by changes in editorial philosophy and increasing interest in raising the stature of the journal within the discipline.

Publication Date
6-1-2010
Publisher
SAGE
ISSN
0887-4034
DOI
doi:10.1177/0887403409353165
Citation Information
Philip M Stinson, Jennifer L Huck and Jason D Spraitz. "A Content Analysis of Criminal Justice Policy Review, 1986-2008" Criminal Justice Policy Review Vol. 21 Iss. 2 (2010) p. 239 - 260
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/philip_stinson/8/