Skip to main content
Contribution to Book
At the Crossroads of Fusion: British North America/Canada, 1750–2000
Equity and Law, Cambridge University Press, 2019, pp. 97–117, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108367820.005.
  • Philip Girard, Osgoode Hall Law School of York University
Document Type
Book Chapter
Publication Date
7-1-2019
Keywords
  • Canada confederation,
  • Chancery Courts,
  • legal innovation,
  • legal colonialism,
  • Upper Canada,
  • Nova Scotia
Abstract

The story of the fusion of law and equity often centres on the story of New York state, whence the Field Code went forth, or of England. This chapter shows the more varied experiences of fusion in colonial British North America, and the degree of experimentation pursued by colonial governments that differentiated the local arrangements – and means of administering equity – from the arrangements at ‘home’ in England, or those in New York state. Initially, equity was often administered only by the governor or colonial council – or by a court of concurrent legal and equitable jurisdiction. Specialist Courts of Chancery came later, and were criticised as the confederation movement grew. Later, the legal colonialism set in which saw the ways of administering equity in England mimicked in the colonies. Even then, local variation survived as in relation to the treatment of mortgages.

Citation Information
Philip Girard. "At the Crossroads of Fusion: British North America/Canada, 1750–2000" Equity and Law, Cambridge University Press, 2019, pp. 97–117, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108367820.005. (2019)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/philip_girard/48/