Skip to main content
Article
Nietzsche, the Kantian Self, and Eternal Recurrence
Philosophy
  • Philip J. Kain, Santa Clara University
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
10-1-2004
Publisher
Philosophy Documentation Center
Disciplines
Abstract

Nietzsche’s concept of the self grows out of Kant—and then attempts to subvert Kant. Nietzsche agrees that a unified subject is a necessary presupposition for ordered experience to be possible. But instead of a Kantian unified self, Nietzsche develops a conception of the self of the sort that we have come to call postmodern. He posits a composite bundle of drives that become unified only through organization. This subject is unified, it is just that its unity is forged, constructed, brought about by domination. But if the self is a bundle of struggling and shifting drives, how could it remain unified over time? Nietzsche’s concept of the self requires his doctrine of eternal recurrence, which promises that I will remain the same, exactly and precisely the same, without the slightest change, not merely throughout this life, but for an eternity of lives.

Comments

This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Kain, P. J. "Nietzsche, the Kantian Self, and Eternal Recurrence," Idealistic Studies, 34 (2004): 225-37, which has been published in final form at http://doi.org/10.5840/idstudies20043435.

Citation Information
Kain, P. J. "Nietzsche, the Kantian Self, and Eternal Recurrence," Idealistic Studies, 34 (2004): 225-37.