![](https://d3ilqtpdwi981i.cloudfront.net/Jj0jgNzg8W71Qh1i0qIVZ6_TTfA=/0x3:120x158/425x550/smart/https://bepress-attached-resources.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/6b/b4/7d/6bb47d2f-e79f-48c4-806f-2e88029811fc/wipo%20journal.png)
Written for a special issue on the politics of intellectual property, this article examines the "country club" approach the negotiating parties of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) embraced to establish new and higher international intellectual property enforcement standards. It points out that the agreement is flawed not only because it is a country club agreement but also because it is a bad country club agreement.
The article then situates ACTA in the context of a recent trend of using bilateral, plurilateral and regional trade and investment agreements to circumvent the multilateral norm-setting process. It contends that this disturbing trend could upset the political dynamics in the current international intellectual property regime.
The article concludes with a discussion of the multiple layers of complex politics behind the ACTA negotiations: international, domestic and global. It focuses on developments both within the new intellectual property enforcement club and without.
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/peter_yu/250/