Skip to main content
Student Performance In A Principle of Microeconomics Course under Hybrid and Face-to-Face Delivery
American Journal of Educational Research (2013)
  • P. Verhoeven, Kennesaw State University
  • T. Rudchenko, Kennesaw State University

Designing a hybrid course entails the challenge of choosing learning activities for each of the face-to-face and online environments--and sequencing and coordinating the activities across the two environments--to promote student attainment of the course’s learning objectives. This paper presents a study comparing student performance in an undergraduate Principles of Microeconomics course taught by the same instructor under hybrid (n = 51) and face-to-face (n = 24) delivery. The percentage of hybrid students completing the course (71%) was not significantly different (chi-square = .61, p = .433) than that (79%) of the face-to-face students. A regression analysis controlling for student GPA indicated that, for students completing the course, the composite test score was, on average, an estimated 4.8 percentage points lower (p = .025, one-tailed) under hybrid delivery than under face-to-face delivery. Student GPA had a strong positive ceteris paribus impact (p = .000, one-tailed) on the composite test score. The finding of a lower level of student learning under hybrid relative to face-to-face delivery is attributed to inattentiveness to pedagogical principles in designing the hybrid course. The study serves as a caution to colleges and universities initiating or expanding their hybrid course offerings in the absence of faculty training or quality control checks. The paper closes with suggestions for further research.

  • hybrid course,
  • blended course,
  • face-to-face course,
  • student learning,
  • pedagogy
Publication Date
Citation Information
Verhoeven, P., Rudchenko, T. (2013). “Student Performance In A Principle of Microeconomics Course under Hybrid and Face-to-Face Delivery.” American Journal of Educational Research, 1(10). 413-418.