Skip to main content
Article
New Governance in European Corporate Law Regulation as Transnational Legal Pluralism
European Law Journal. Volume 15, Number 2 (2009), p. 246-276.
  • Peer Zumbansen, Osgoode Hall Law School of York University
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2009
Abstract
The present transformation of European corporate governance regulation mirrors the challenges that have been facing the EU's continuously evolving polity, marked by tensions between centralised integration programmes, on the one hand, and Member State's embedded capitalisms, path-dependencies and rent-seeking, on the other. As longstanding concerns with remaining obstacles to more mobility for workers, services, business entities and capital in recent years are aligned with post-Lisbon commitments to creating the world's leading competitive market, European corporate governance regulation (ECGR) has become exposed to and implicated in a set of highly dynamic regulatory experiments. In this context, New Governance offers itself as both a tentative label and immodest proposal for a more responsive and innovative approach to European law making. The following article assesses the recently emerging regulatory forms in ECGR as illustrations of far-reaching transformations in market governance. The arguable parallels between the EU's regulatory transformation in response to growing legitimacy concerns and the recurring question about whose interests a business corporation is intended to serve, provide the framework for an exploration of current regulatory trajectories in European corporate law that can most adequately be understood as a telling example of transnational legal pluralism.
Comments

This article was previously published as a research paper in the Comparative Research in Law and Political Economy series.

Creative Commons License
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0
Citation Information
Zumbansen, Peer. "New Governance in European Corporate Law Regulation as Transnational Legal Pluralism." European Law Journal 15.2 (2009): 246-276.