Skip to main content
Article
Law after the Welfare State: Formalism, Functionalism and the Ironic Turn of Reflexive Law
American Journal of Comparative Law. Volume 56, Issue 3 (2008), p. 769-805.
  • Peer Zumbansen, Osgoode Hall Law School of York University
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2008
Abstract
This paper analyzes the contemporary emergence of neo-formalist and neo-functionalist approaches to law-making at a time when the state is seeking to reassert, reformulate and reconceptualize its regulatory competence, both domestically and transnationally. While the earlier turn to alternative regulation modes, conceptualized under the heading of "legal pluralism," "responsive law," or "reflexive law" in the 1970s and 1980s, had aimed at a more socially responsive, contextualized, and ultimately learning mode of legal intervention, the contemporary revival of functionalist jurisprudence and its reliance on "social norms" embraces a limitation model of legal regulation. After revisiting the Legal Realist critique of Formalism and the formulation of functionalist regulation as a progressive agenda, this paper compares the American and German experiences with the rise of the social interventionist state in order to ask where law stands "after the welfare state" at the outset of the twenty-first century.
Comments

This article was previously published as a research paper in the Comparative Research in Law and Political Economy series.

Creative Commons License
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0
Citation Information
Zumbansen, Peer. "Law after the Welfare State: Formalism, Functionalism and the Ironic Turn of Reflexive Law." American Journal of Comparative Law 56.3 (2008): 769-805.