Skip to main content
American sociology and the limits of partisan expertise
The American Sociologist
  • William Peter BAEHR, Lingnan University, Hong Kong
Document Type
Journal article
Publication Date
  • Declinism,
  • Elite sociology,
  • Feminization,
  • Partisan expertise,
  • Reformism

Stephen Turner's brief history of American sociology culminates in a description of its current state and prospects. The collapse of the behavioral science ideal, and the aversion to big theory, Turner argues, suggests that sociology is ever more approximating what it was in its early reformist days: a partisan endeavor, oriented to social justice, guided by and legitimized by fact-producing techniques of broadly sociological provenance. The demographic ascendancy of women in the discipline, Turner continues, is likely to accentuate this development and will parallel, rather than transform, the caste-like exclusivity of the top twenty sociology departments and the AJS/ASR nexus. This article examines Turner's analogy of previous partisan expertise with its contemporary manifestations. It argues that the analogy is misleading, and that the 'post-normal' sociology Turner sketches is of doubtful expertise precisely because of its antipathy to serious critical thought and open enquiry.

Publisher Statement

Copyright © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Access to external full text or publisher's version may require subscription.

Full-text Version
Publisher’s Version
Citation Information
Baehr, P. (2015). American sociology and the limits of partisan expertise. American Sociologist, 46(1), 40-50. doi: 10.1007/s12108-014-9244-7