Faster title and abstract screening? Evaluating Abstrackr, a semi-automated online screening program for systematic reviewersSystematic reviews
Date of this Version1-1-2015
Document TypeJournal Article
AbstractBackground: Citation screening is time consuming and inefficient. We sought to evaluate the performance of Abstrackr, a semi-automated online tool for predictive title and abstract screening. Methods: Four systematic reviews (aHUS, dietary fibre, ECHO, rituximab) were used to evaluate Abstrackr. Citations from electronic searches of biomedical databases were imported into Abstrackr, and titles and abstracts were screened and included or excluded according to the entry criteria. This process was continued until Abstrackr predicted and classified the remaining unscreened citations as relevant or irrelevant. These classification predictions were checked for accuracy against the original review decisions. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the effects of including case reports in the aHUS dataset whilst screening and the effects of using larger imbalanced datasets with the ECHO dataset. The performance of Abstrackr was calculated according to the number of relevant studies missed, the workload saving, the false negative rate, and the precision of the algorithm to correctly predict relevant studies for inclusion, i.e. further full text inspection.
Citation InformationJohn Rathbone, Tammy Hoffmann and Paul Glasziou. "Faster title and abstract screening? Evaluating Abstrackr, a semi-automated online screening program for systematic reviewers" Systematic reviews Vol. 4 Iss. 80 (2015) p. 1 - 7 ISSN: 2046-4053
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/paul_glasziou/167/