Skip to main content
Article
I don't believe it, but I'd better do something about it: Patient experiences of online heart age risk calculators
Journal of Medical Internet research
  • Carissa Bonner, University of Sydney
  • Jesse Jansen, University of Sydney
  • Ben Newell, University of NSW
  • Les Irwig, University of Sydney
  • Paul Glasziou, Bond University
  • Jenny Doust, Bond University
  • Haryana Dhillon, University of Sydney
  • Kirsten McCaffery, University of Sydney
Date of this Version
1-1-2014
Document Type
Journal Article
Publication Details

Citation only

Bonner, C., Jansen, J., Newell, B. R., Irwig, L., Glasziou, P., Doust, J., Dhillon, H., & McCaffery, K. (2014). I don't believe it, but I'd better do something about it: Patient experiences of online heart age risk calculators. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(5).

Access the journal

© Copyright, The Authors, 2014

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 License

Abstract

Background: Health risk calculators are widely available on the Internet, including cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk calculators that estimate the probability of a heart attack, stroke, or death over a 5- or 10-year period. Some calculators convert this probability to "heart age", where a heart age older than current age indicates modifiable risk factors. These calculators may impact patient decision making about CVD risk management with or without clinician involvement, but little is known about how patients use them. Previous studies have not investigated patient understanding of heart age compared to 5-year percentage risk, or the best way to present heart age. Objective: This study aimed to investigate patient experiences and understanding of online heart age calculators that use different verbal, numerical, and graphical formats, based on 5- and 10-year Framingham risk equations used in clinical practice guidelines around the world. Methods: General practitioners in New South Wales, Australia, recruited 26 patients with CVD/lifestyle risk factors who were not taking cholesterol or blood pressure-lowering medication in 2012. Participants were asked to "think aloud" while using two heart age calculators in random order, with semi-structured interviews before and after. Transcribed audio recordings were coded and a framework analysis method was used. Results: Risk factor questions were often misinterpreted, reducing the accuracy of the calculators. Participants perceived older heart age as confronting and younger heart age as positive but unrealistic. Unexpected or contradictory results (eg, low percentage risk but older heart age) led participants to question the credibility of the calculators. Reasons to discredit the results included the absence of relevant lifestyle questions and impact of corporate sponsorship. However, the calculators prompted participants to consider lifestyle changes irrespective of whether they received younger, same, or older heart age results. Conclusions: Online heart age calculators can be misunderstood and disregarded if they produce unexpected or contradictory results, but they may still motivate lifestyle changes. Future research should investigate both the benefits and harms of communicating risk in this way, and how to increase the reliability and credibility of online health risk calculators.

Citation Information
Carissa Bonner, Jesse Jansen, Ben Newell, Les Irwig, et al.. "I don't believe it, but I'd better do something about it: Patient experiences of online heart age risk calculators" Journal of Medical Internet research (2014) ISSN: 1438-8871
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/paul_glasziou/121/