Article
Catharsis in Education: Rationalizing and Reconciling
Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue
(2015)
Abstract
William Pinar's text What is Curriculum Theory (Pinar, 2012) reaffirms the question of what role education should play in a person's life. This would seem like an enduring and guiding topic of inquiry for a person working in teacher preparation at an institution of higher education. A growing and dominating focus on standardization, assessment, and accountability through accreditation consumes both attention and energy. Preparation of teacher candidates for a world of compliance overwhelms their preparation as agents of transformation. This externally mandated focus prevents the type of thought and dialogue that considers the "should" in education.Â
This paradigm, a neoliberal framework that emphasizes college and career readiness as the mantra of purpose and that relies upon the "law of the market" to regulate educational institutions like any other gadget maker, neglects the primary stakeholders in education--the learners and their communities.
Internal and external education stakeholders play politics with what is expected, often corrupting the potentially democratic process with force, funding, and other ideologically driven coercion. In many instances the "desired" outcome or standard is taken for granted because legislated or authorized in title and description. The contestability of the desired learning outcomes within democratic dialogue is co-opted by powerful stakeholders with either the political or economic power to determine policy. Understanding how these stakeholders are motivated and what positive antecedent (rational choice stimulus) lead to their cooptation of the process helps to identify fractures in the hegemonic neoliberal structure. Recognizing neoliberalism's dominance is not enough. It is critical that the gaps and collateral implications of the ideological system are exposed and examined. Opening the space for re-storying education presents a challenge. This critical analysis of the motivations and complex interconnection of policy is meant to open such a space.
Keywords
- Education Policy--Analysis,
- Curriculum standards--laws,
- regulations and rules,
- Educational tests--laws
Disciplines
Publication Date
Winter January, 2015
Citation Information
Paul Parkison. "Catharsis in Education: Rationalizing and Reconciling" Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue Vol. 17 Iss. 1-2 (2015) Available at: http://works.bepress.com/paul-parkison/7/