Skip to main content
Article
Freedom of speech issues in Toohey v Peach and a hypothetical variant of that case
Pacific Journalism Review (2004)
  • Patrick Keyzer, University of Technology, Sydney
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to consider the tensions within Australian free speech jurisprudence based on a hypothetical variant of the facts of the decision of the Supreme Court of the Northern Territory in Peach v Toohey. In particular, this article briefly explores the competing legal interests that operate when journalists seek access to restricted areas, in this case aboriginal land, in the course of an investigation. After considering the case and the issues it raises the author develops a hypothetical that draws out some of the deeper tensions in this area of the law. The article concludes with proposals for new approaches to the test developed by the High Court of Australia in Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation for the balancing of freedom to discuss political and governmental affairs - including the public right to know - against other legitimate objectives such as the maintenance of property rights and the privacy interests that can be associated with property rights.
Keywords
  • freedom of speech
Publication Date
April, 2004
Publisher Statement
Published version

Keyzer, P. (2004). Freedom of speech issues in Toohey v Peach and a hypothetical variant of that case. Pacific Journalism Review, 10(1), 139-153

© Copyright AUT, 2004
Citation Information
Patrick Keyzer. "Freedom of speech issues in Toohey v Peach and a hypothetical variant of that case" Pacific Journalism Review Vol. 10 Iss. 1 (2004)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/patrick_keyzer/57/