Skip to main content
Article
The United Nations Human Rights Committee's views about the legitimate parameters of the preventive detention of serious sex offenders
Criminal Law Journal
  • Patrick Keyzer, Bond University
Date of this Version
10-1-2010
Document Type
Journal Article
Publication Details

Citation only.

Keyzer, P. (2010). The United Nations Human Rights Committee's views about the legitimate parameters of the preventive detention of serious sex offenders. Criminal Law Journal, 34(5), 283-291.

Access the publisher

2010 HERDC submission. FoR Code: 180100

© Copyright Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia Limited, 2010

Disciplines
Abstract

Legislation that is presently in place in a majority of the Australian States adopts the radical approach of using prison as a venue for the preventive detention of sex offenders after the conclusion of their prison sentences. The High Court of Australia upheld the constitutional validity of Queensland's legislation in 2004. But the United Nations Human Rights Committee has recently found that the preventive detention regimes in the Queensland and New South Wales (and, by implication, Western Australia and Victoria) are in violation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which provides for guarantees of due process and prohibits arbitrary detention and the retroactive infliction of increased punishment. This article reviews the Committee's decisions, and examines their implications.

Citation Information
Patrick Keyzer. "The United Nations Human Rights Committee's views about the legitimate parameters of the preventive detention of serious sex offenders" Criminal Law Journal Vol. 34 Iss. 5 (2010) p. 283 - 291
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/patrick_keyzer/36/