Skip to main content
Article
Making Implementation More Democratic through Action Implementation Research
Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (2009)
  • Pamela Mischen, Binghamton University--SUNY
Abstract
Public administration scholars often associate increased public participation in policy implementation with the advancement of democratic values. Likewise, scholars engaged in the various forms of action research (AR) promote their efforts as a means to democratizing the research process or contributing to improved social outcomes. Despite these common interests in participation and democracy, there have been few attempts to apply AR methods to policy implementation problems. Drawing on Matland's conflict-ambiguity matrix, we develop a framework for matching particular AR methods to specific policy implementation contexts.
Disciplines
Publication Date
2009
DOI
10.1093/jopart/mum040
Publisher Statement
This is the metadata of an article accepted for publication in the Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory following peer review. The version of record Mischen, P. A., & Sinclair, T. A. (2009). Making implementation more democratic through action implementation research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(1), 145-164. is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum040
Citation Information
Mischen, P. A., & Sinclair, T. A. (2009). Making implementation more democratic through action implementation research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(1), 145-164.