Skip to main content
Informing Evidence: Claimsmaking in Midwives' and Clients' Talk about Interventions
Qualitative Health Research
  • Pamela J. McKenzie, University of Western Ontario
  • Tami Oliphant, University of Western Ontario
Document Type
Publication Date
URL with Digital Object Identifier

Communication for informed choice is particularly challenging in clinical settings such as direct-entry midwifery, where the care model embraces diverse therapies and forms of knowledge. We identified three discursive moves (explanation, invocation, and evaluation) that Ontario midwives and clients used in making claims about proposed interventions. The analysis was informed by an understanding of communication as an interactionally situated and socially constructed interpretive practice. Both midwives and women called on the authority of biomedical discourse, but they also turned to sources such as women’s wisdom to support their cases. The flexible use of these moves afforded participants considerable latitude in accepting or rejecting forms of evidence as authoritative. However, strategies designed to empower clients in making choices could unintentionally serve to enhance the authority of the care provider. Talk about interventions brings into view both the knowledge systems and the broader relations within which regulated midwifery practice operates.

Citation Information
Pamela J. McKenzie and Tami Oliphant. "Informing Evidence: Claimsmaking in Midwives' and Clients' Talk about Interventions" Qualitative Health Research Vol. 20 Iss. 1 (2010) p. 29 - 41
Available at: