Skip to main content
Article
Resistance to cyclic fatigue of reciprocating instruments determined at body temperature and phase transformation analysis
Australian Endodontic Journal (2019)
  • Raymond Scott, University of the Pacific
  • Ana Arias, University of the Pacific
  • José C. Macorra
  • Sanjay Govindjee
  • Ove A. Peters, University of the Pacific
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare cyclic fatigue (CF) resistance of reciprocating instruments at body temperature and relate the findings to their martensitic transformation temperatures. Contemporary nickel-titanium (NiTi) reciprocating instruments WaveOne Primary, WaveOne Gold Primary and EdgeFile X1 (n = 20 each and #25 tip diameter) were tested for CF resistance at body temperature (37 ± 1°C). Instruments were actioned according to manufacturer guidelines until fracture occurred in a simulated canal (angle of curvature = 60°, radius of curvature = 3 mm and centre of curvature = 5 mm from the tip). Time to fracture was recorded, and data analysed using Weibull analysis. Two instruments of each were tested using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) to assess phase transformation temperatures. Reciprocating instruments manufactured with new alloys seem to be safer to CF than those manufactured with traditional M-Wire at body temperature. Martensitic transformation temperatures seem not to relate with fatigue behaviour for reciprocating motions.
Keywords
  • Body temperature,
  • Cyclic fatigue resistance,
  • Differential scanning calorimetry,
  • Martensitic transformation temperature
Publication Date
December, 2019
DOI
10.1111/aej.12374
Citation Information
Raymond Scott, Ana Arias, José C. Macorra, Sanjay Govindjee, et al.. "Resistance to cyclic fatigue of reciprocating instruments determined at body temperature and phase transformation analysis" Australian Endodontic Journal Vol. 45 Iss. 3 (2019) p. 400 - 406 ISSN: 31562682
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/ove-peters/159/