![](https://d3ilqtpdwi981i.cloudfront.net/Z9jqRgCXq1bFUO53cd7koDoJ68c=/425x550/smart/https://bepress-attached-resources.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/0a/43/a3/0a43a370-27dc-4467-a9ec-f9f79057cfef/thumbnail_edce383b-f5c0-46ca-b398-cf638aa01423.jpg)
- Companies Income Tax Act,
- Trade War,
- Human Rights,
- Nigeria
In January 2020 when I first read Nigeria’s Finance Act 2019, one of the instinctive questions that came to me was “is Nigeria serious about taxing digital trade now”? There were a few reasons for this skepticism. First, the Act seeks to tax nonresident companies (NRCs) that have a “significant economic presence” (SEP) in Nigeria but then delegates the definition of that pivotal phrase. Second, I questioned how Nigeria can enforce/administer this unilateral tax, which is payable by companies outside its borders. Third, I imagined that Nigeria’s unilateral attempt to tax digital trade could undermine relations with a strategic economic, and political partner, the US. Nigeria has now crossed the first hurdle of defining SEP – no doubt, a meaningful step forward – yet, there remains much to process before Africa’s biggest economy can begin to milk the digital cow.