Article
Breaking out of the Gricean vicious cycle: Let’s divorce semantics and just agree that there is no meaning in language
International Journal of Language Studies
(2022)
Abstract
The existing theories of meaning are classifiable into semantic and foundational categories. After a brief overview of these categories, the current paper will dwell on a discussion of what has urged pragmaticists to endorse a dovetailing of semantics and pragmatics in their attempts at presenting a comprehensive and exhaustive account of meaning. The paper then uses Balkhi’s analogy of ‘the elephant in the dark room’ to argue that (a) all of the existing theories of meaning are inadequate, and that (b) the Gricean vicious cycle is also the product of pragmaticists’ mistaking complimentary distribution for inclusional distribution. Arguing in favor of a physiological theory of meaning, the paper concludes that a comprehensive theory of meaning has to be a theory of human brain and/or mind and should be foundational.
Keywords
- Davidsonian Semantics,
- Dynamic Semantics,
- Expressivist Semantics,
- Fregean Semantics,
- Gricean Circle,
- Inferentialist Semantics,
- Internalist Semantics,
- Possible Worlds Semantics,
- Russellian Semantics,
- Theory of Reference
Disciplines
Publication Date
Summer July 1, 2022
Citation Information
Salmani Nodoushan, M. A. (2022). Breaking out of the Gricean vicious cycle: Let’s divorce semantics and just agree that there is no meaning in language. International Journal of Language Studies, 16(3), 33-60.
Creative Commons license
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons CC_BY-NC-ND International License.