Skip to main content
Article
Standardised library instruction assessment: an institution-specific approach
Staff publications, research, and presentations
  • Shannon M. Staley
  • Nicole A. Branch, Santa Clara University
  • Tom L. Hewitt
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
10-1-2010
Publisher
Professor T.D. Wilson
Abstract

Introduction. We explore the use of a psychometric model for locallyrelevant, information literacy assessment, using an online tool for standardised assessment of student learning during discipline-based library instruction sessions. Method. A quantitative approach to data collection and analysis was used, employing standardised multiple-choice survey questions followed by individual, cognitive interviews with undergraduate students. The assessment tool was administered to five general education psychology classes during library instruction sessions. Analysis. Descriptive statistics were generated by the assessment tool. Results. The assessment tool proved a feasible means of measuring student learning. While student scores improved on every survey question, there was uneven improvement from pre-test to post-test for different questions. Conclusion. Student scores showed more improvement for some learning outcomes over others, thus, spending time on fewer concepts during instruction sessions would enable more reliable evaluation of student learning. We recommend using digital learning objects that address basic research skills to enhance library instruction programmes. Future studies will explore different applications of the assessment tool, provide more detailed statistical analysis of the data and shed additional light on the significance of overall scores.

Comments

© 2010 by the authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the CC BY-NC 3.0. No changes were made.

Citation Information
Staley, Shannon M., Branch, Nicole A., & Hewitt, Tom L. (2010). Standardised library instruction assessment: an institution-specific approach. Information Research 15(3).