Skip to main content
Article
Tensions in post-examination feedback: information for learning versus potential for harm
Medical Education (2017)
  • Anna Ryan, University of Melbourne
  • Geoffrey J McColl, University of Melbourne
  • Richard O'Brien, University of Melbourne
  • Neville Chiavaroli, University of Melbourne
  • Terry Judd, University of Melbourne
  • Sue Finch, University of Melbourne
  • David Swanson, University of Melbourne
Abstract
Self-regulation is recognised as being a requisite skill for professional practice This study is part of a programme of research designed to explore efficient methods of feedback that improve medical students' ability to self-regulate their learning. Our aim was to clarify how students respond to different forms and content of written feedback and to explore the impact on study behaviour and knowledge acquisition.
Keywords
  • Clinical competence,
  • Medical education,
  • Undergraduate,
  • Educational measurement,
  • Feedback,
  • Learning,
  • Peer group
Publication Date
September 1, 2017
DOI
10.1111/medu.13366
Citation Information
Anna Ryan, Geoffrey J McColl, Richard O'Brien, Neville Chiavaroli, et al.. "Tensions in post-examination feedback: information for learning versus potential for harm" Medical Education Vol. 51 Iss. 9 (2017) p. 963 - 973
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/neville-chiavaroli/2/