Skip to main content
Article
Nebraska Suppressed: How Gagging the News Media Intensified Pretrial Press Coverage of the Simants’ Murder Case
Journalism History
  • Nancy Whitmore, Butler University
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
10-1-2003
Abstract

Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart(n1) began with the issuance of a court order that prohibited the publication of testimony and evidence presented at a preliminary hearing of a suspected mass murderer. With this judicial action, a press-bar contest ensued that hamstrung the media's reporting capabilities as it struggled for seventy-nine days under four gag orders to cover one of the most brutal murders in Nebraska history. Throughout the controversy, the Nebraska press chose to comply with the restrictive orders; and this article examines the effects of that choice. Specifically, it explores how the Nebraska press functional under the various restrictive orders, how closely the print coverage adhered to the restrictive orders, and how effectively the orders controlled the release of information deemed prejudicial by the judiciary.

Rights

This article was archived with permission from E.W. Scrips School of Journalism, all rights reserved. Document also available from Journalism History.

Citation Information
Nancy Whitmore. “Nebraska Suppressed: How Gagging the News Media Intensified Pretrial Press Coverage of the Simants’ Murder Case,” Journalism History, Vol. 29, No. 3 (Fall 2003) Available from: digitalcommons.butler.edu/ccom_papers/11/