Skip to main content
Qualitative Analysis Techniques for the Review of the Literature
The Qualitative Report
  • Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie, Sam Houston State University
  • Nancy L. Leech, University of Colorado Denver
  • Kathleen M. T. Collins, University of Arkansas at Fayetteville
In this article, we provide a framework for analyzing and interpreting sources that inform a literature review or, as it is more aptly called, a research synthesis. Specifically, using Leech and Onwuegbuzie’s (2007, 2008) frameworks, we delineate how the following four major source types inform research syntheses: talk, observations, drawings/photographs/videos, and documents. We identify 17 qualitative data analysis techniques that are optimal for analyzing one or more of these source types. Further, we outline the role that the following five qualitative data analysis techniques can play in the research synthesis: constant comparison analysis, domain analysis, taxonomic analysis, componential analysis, and theme analysis. We contend that our framework represents a first step in an attempt to help literature reviewers analyze and interpret literature in an optimally rigorous way.
  • Review of the Literature,
  • Research Synthesis,
  • Qualitative Analysis,
  • Constant Comparison Analysis,
  • Domain Analysis,
  • Taxonomic Analysis,
  • Componential Analysis,
  • Theme Analysis
Publication Date
Creative Commons License
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0
Geolocate this article
(30.713945, -95.548303)
Citation Information
Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie, Nancy L. Leech and Kathleen M. T. Collins. "Qualitative Analysis Techniques for the Review of the Literature" (2012) p. 1 - 28
Available at: