Unconscious null-para patient arrives in emergency room with the uterine rupture in progress. The obstetrician performs cesarean section followed by hysterectomy. Understandably, the surgery causes a permanent impairment. Result? No battery. Why? The hospital and physicians can prove an affirmative defense of consent. In a prima facie case, for a patient incapable of giving or withholding consent, the consent is implied by law. So too, there was no intent to harm the patient. What about negligence? There is a room for a negligence claim in this case, because the hospital and physicians had the duty to perform a procedure with careful considerations of the per quod determinants, burden/benefit ratio, including the wishes of the patient to remain fecund or fertile. They didn't, as such, they caused a damage. To establish a negligence, the informed consent doctrine is irrelevant, for this case addresses all the six elements of medical negligence: duty, applicable standard of care, breach, actual cause, proximate case, and damage. The law of surgical negligence is an ever-evolving overhaul of acts, codes, doctrines, or statutes. Any definition in surgical malpractice that includes the notion of reasonableness raises alarm bells. The action for surgical negligence may extend from misdiagnoses, mispresentation, to injurious falsehood, misrepresentation, investment privilege, joint ownership, patent infringement, state of mind, culpability, or defamation. Packed in 27 chapters, with 29 illustrations of surgical scenes, the current effort analyzes 50 published cases of surgical negligence, from I.R.A.C. (issue, rule, analysis, conclusion), precedents, legal limits, concurring/dissent, to dispositions or verdicts, remedies, and reasoning pursuant to the Constitutional or statute enactments in the United States and District of Columbia. The presented cases are located via LexisNexis,™ BlueBook, Westlaw, and Bloomberg Law. All cases are published, thus free for public access under the U.S. Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act (HIPAA), the Brady Rule, the Patient Safety & Quality Improvement Act 2005 (PSQIA), 14th Amendment Due Process Clause, 17 U.S.C. §§ 512, Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA); among other instruments. Each case analysis ends with keywords. The account set in this book is to aid surgeons avoid or limit expenses on the legal counsel, and to aid litigators avoid or limit expenses on the expert opinions. The leading goal of this effort, is to cement another layer to moral foundation of surgical care and signature care.