Skip to main content
Mandated reporters' experiences with reporting child maltreatment: A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies
BMJ Open
  • Jill R. McTavish, McMaster University
  • Melissa Kimber, McMaster University
  • Karen Devries, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
  • Manuela Colombini, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
  • Jennifer C.D. Macgregor, The University of Western Ontario
  • C. Nadine Wathen, The University of Western Ontario
  • Arnav Agarwal, University of Toronto
  • Harriet L. MacMillan, McMaster University
Document Type
Publication Date
URL with Digital Object Identifier

Objective To systematically search for research about the effectiveness of mandatory reporting of child maltreatment and to synthesise qualitative research that explores mandated reporters' (MRS) experiences with reporting. Design As no studies assessing the effectiveness of mandatory reporting were retrieved from our systematic search, we conducted a meta-synthesis of retrieved qualitative research. Searches in Medline (Ovid), Embase, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Sociological Abstracts, Education Resources Information Center, Criminal Justice Abstracts and Cochrane Library yielded over 6000 citations, which were deduplicated and then screened by two independent reviewers. English-language, primary qualitative studies that investigated MRS' experiences with reporting of child maltreatment were included. Critical appraisal involved a modified checklist from the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme and qualitative meta-synthesis was used to combine results from the primary studies. Setting All healthcare and social-service settings implicated by mandatory reporting laws were included. Included studies crossed nine high-income countries (USA, Australia, Sweden, Taiwan, Canada, Norway, Finland, Israel and Cyprus) and three middle-income countries (South Africa, Brazil and El Salvador). Participants: The studies represent the views of 1088 MRS. Outcomes Factors that influence MRS' decision to report and MRS' views towards and experiences with mandatory reporting of child maltreatment. Results Forty-four articles reporting 42 studies were included. Findings indicate that MRS struggle to identify and respond to less overt forms of child maltreatment. While some articles (14%) described positive experiences MRS had with the reporting process, negative experiences were reported in 73% of articles and included accounts of harm to therapeutic relationships and child death following removal from their family of origin. Conclusions The findings of this meta-synthesis suggest that there are many potentially harmful experiences associated with mandatory reporting and that research on the effectiveness of this process is urgently needed.

Citation Information
Jill R. McTavish, Melissa Kimber, Karen Devries, Manuela Colombini, et al.. "Mandated reporters' experiences with reporting child maltreatment: A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies" BMJ Open Vol. 7 Iss. 10 (2017)
Available at: