Skip to main content
Article
Evidence for involvement of non‐classical pathways in the protection from UV‐induced DNA damage by vitamin D‐related compounds
JBMR Plus
  • Warusavithana Gunawardena Manori De Silva, University of Sydney
  • Jeremy Zhuo Ru Han, University of Sydney
  • Chen Yang, University of Sydney
  • Wannit Tongkao‐On, University of Sydney
  • Bianca Yuko McCarthy, University of Sydney
  • Furkan Akif Ince, University of Sydney
  • Andrew J A Holland, Children's Hospital at Westmead; University of Sydney
  • Robert Charles Tuckey, University of Western Australia
  • Andrzej T Slominski, University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • Myriam Abboud, Zayed University
  • Katie Marie Dixon, University of Sydney
  • Mark Stephen Rybchyn, University of Sydney; UNSW Sydney
  • Rebecca Sara Mason, University of Sydney; University of Sydney
ORCID Identifiers

0000-0003-1534-9697

Document Type
Article
Publication Date
9-13-2021
Abstract

The vitamin D hormone, 1,25dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3), and related compounds derived from vitamin D3 or lumisterol as a result of metabolism via the enzyme CYP11A1, have been shown, when applied 24 hours before or immediately after UV irradiation, to protect human skin cells and skin from DNA damage due to UV exposure, by reducing both cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPD) and oxidative damage in the form of 8‐oxo‐7,8‐dihydro‐2’‐ deoxyguanosine (8‐OHdG). We now report that knockdown of either the vitamin D receptor or the endoplasmic reticulum protein ERp57 by siRNA abolished the reductions in UV‐induced DNA damage with 20‐hydroxyvitamin D3 or 24‐hydroxylumisterol3, as previously shown for 1,25(OH)2D3. Treatment with 1,25(OH)2D3 reduced oxygen consumption rates in UV‐exposed and sham‐exposed human keratinocytes and reduced phosphorylation of CREB (cyclic AMP response binding element protein). Both these actions have been shown to inhibit skin carcinogenesis after chronic UV exposure, consistent with the anticarcinogenic activity of 1,25(OH)2D3. The requirement for a vitamin D receptor for the photoprotective actions of 1,25(OH)2D3 and of naturally occurring CYP11A1‐derived vitamin D related compounds may explain why mice lacking the vitamin D receptor in skin are more susceptible to UV‐induced skin cancers, whereas mice lacking the 1α‐hydroxylase and thus unable to make 1,25(OH)2D3 are not more susceptible. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Publisher
Wiley
Scopus ID
85116060482
Creative Commons License
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Indexed in Scopus
Yes
Open Access
Yes
Open Access Type
Gold: This publication is openly available in an open access journal/series
Citation Information
Warusavithana Gunawardena Manori De Silva, Jeremy Zhuo Ru Han, Chen Yang, Wannit Tongkao‐On, et al.. "Evidence for involvement of non‐classical pathways in the protection from UV‐induced DNA damage by vitamin D‐related compounds" JBMR Plus (2021)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/myriam-abboud/19/