Skip to main content
Transforming higher education in whose image? Exploring the concept of the "world-class" university in Europe and Asia
Higher Education Policy
  • Rosemary DEEM, University of Bristol, UK
  • Ka Ho, Joshua MOK, University of Hong Kong
  • Lisa LUCAS, University of Bristol, UK
Document Type
Journal article
Publication Date
  • world-class university,
  • Europe and Asia,
  • policy learning or copying,
  • zero-sum game,
  • changing university governance

In order to enhance their global competitiveness, governments in Europe and Asia have started to conduct comprehensive reviews of and implement plans to restructure their higher education systems, with attempts to transform their higher education systems in the image of 'world-class' university. With strong intentions to perform well in the Global University Ranking, universities in Europe and Asia have adopted different reform measures to enhance their research performance. Central to the quest for the world-class status, we have witnessed the emerging global model (EGM) of the research university in the 21st century, a description of the top stratum of research universities worldwide. It is against this particular context that different forms of university research networks, university alliance or international research consortia have evolved to promote international collaboration aiming at higher ranking in the global university league. The principal goal of this article aims at critically examining the notions and practices of what it means to be a world-class university in the context of Europe and Asia, especially attempting to examine the impacts of the quest for the world-class status on higher education in Europe and Asia.

Publisher Statement
Access to external full text or publisher's version may require subscription.
Full-text Version
Publisher’s Version
Citation Information
Deem, R., Mok, K. H., & Lucas, L. (2008). Transforming higher education in whose image? Exploring the concept of the "world-class" university in Europe and Asia. Higher Education Policy, 21(1), 83-97. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300179