Skip to main content
Article
Controversies of treatment modalities for cerebral venous thrombosis.
Stroke Research and Treatment
  • Maria Khan, Aga Khan University
  • Ayeesha Kamran Kamal, Aga Khan University
  • Mohammad Wasay, Aga Khan University
Publication Date
12-19-2010
Document Type
Article
Disciplines
Abstract
Cerebral vein thrombosis has been well recognized for nearly two centuries. However, therapeutic options for the condition are limited due to lack of large randomized trials. The various modalities reportedly used include antiplatelets, anticoagulation, fibrinolysis, and mechanical thrombectomy. Of these, antiplatelets are the least studied, and there are only anecdotal reports of aspirin use. Anticoagulation is the most widely used and accepted modality with favorable outcomes documented in two randomized controlled trials. Various fibrinolytic agents have also been tried. Local infusions have shown more promise compared to systemic agents. Similarly, mechanical thrombectomy has been used to augment the effects of chemical thrombolysis. However, in the absence of randomized controlled trials, there is no concrete evidence of the safety and efficacy of either of these modalities. Limited study series disclosed that decompression surgery in malignant CVT can be life saving and provides good neurological outcome in some cases. Conclusion. Overall therapeutics for CVT need larger randomized controlled trials. Anticoagulaion with heparin is the only modality with a reasonable evidence to support its use in CVT. Endovascular thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy are reserved for selected cases who fail anticoagulation and decompression surgery for malignant CVT with impending herniation.
Citation Information
Maria Khan, Ayeesha Kamran Kamal and Mohammad Wasay. "Controversies of treatment modalities for cerebral venous thrombosis." Stroke Research and Treatment Vol. 2010 (2010) p. 956302
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/mohammad_wasay/1/