Skip to main content
Article
Recasting leadership reform in Australian local government: a typology from political theory
Local Government Studies
  • Bligh Grant, University of New England
  • Brian Dollery, University of New England
  • Michael Kortt, Southern Cross University
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2016
Peer Reviewed
Peer-Reviewed
Abstract
Changes to elected leadership in Australian local government have seen greater authority assigned to mayors in several jurisdictions. A Discussion Paper recently released under the auspices of the Australian Centre for Excellence in Local Government (ACELG) has recommended further reforms, arguing inter alia that mayors ought to enjoy a personal mandate and a stronger strategic role. This paper places these suggested reforms into context by developing a typology of local government leadership from political theory. We argue that this quadrilateral typology provides a critical portrait of recommendations for stronger leadership which, in this instance, have been transposed from two unitary systems of government (England and New Zealand) to the Australian federal system, without due consideration of the literature examining stronger mayoral roles. It is argued that caution should be exercised when redrafting legislation governing mayoral authority, a process presently underway in New South Wales (NSW).
Disciplines
Citation Information

Grant, B, Dollery, B & Kortt, M in press, 'Recasting leadership reform in Australian local government: a typology from political theory', Local Government Studies, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1024-1046.

Published version available from:

http://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2013.861820