Skip to main content
Unpublished Paper
Down-sizing The Little Guy Myth in Legal Definitions
ExpressO (2012)
  • Mirit Eyal-Cohen, University of Pittsburgh - Main Campus

What is “small” in the eyes of the law? In fact, there is not one standard definition. Current lax legal definitions of firm’s size are inconsistent and overinclusive. They result in data distortion that reinforces favoritism toward small entities as studies on the contribution of small business to the economy are greatly dependent on those studies’ delineation of the term “small.” Therefore, I argue that the current focus on size in legal definitions is a waste of time and money. In this time of huge deficits and rise in economic inequality, a lot of money is being spent based on the entrenched belief that small firms are the essence of our economy, which is not necessarily true.

This paper lays out the policy considerations that underlie the favorable regulatory treatment granted to small firms throughout the law. It provides a comprehensive survey of legal definitions of small entities and concludes that the historical emphasis on magnitude and the creation of legal demarcations concentrated on “smallness” are erroneous. The recent integration of federal commerce and trade agencies is the first step toward this proposed shift from size-centered to goal-driven approach.

  • small business,
  • small firm,
  • myth,
  • definition,
  • public policy,
  • size,
  • standard
Publication Date
February 13, 2012
Citation Information
Mirit Eyal-Cohen. "Down-sizing The Little Guy Myth in Legal Definitions" ExpressO (2012)
Available at: