Skip to main content
Learning strategies and transfer in the domain of programming
Cognition and Instruction
  • Peter Pirolli, Georgia Institute of Technology - Main Campus
  • Mimi Recker, Utah State University
Document Type
Taylor & Francis
Publication Date
We report two studies involving an intelligent tutoring system for Lisp (the Camegie Mellon University Lisp Tutor). In Experiment 1, we developed a model, based on production system theories of transfer and analogical problem solving, that accounts for effects of instructional examples, the transfer of cognitive skills across programming problems, and practice effects. In Experiment 2, we analyzed protocols collected from subjects as they processed instructional texts and examples before working with the Lisp Tutor and protocols collected after subjects solved each programming problem. The results suggest that the acquisition of cognitive skills is facilitated by high degrees of metacognition, which includes higher degrees of monitoring states of knowledge, more self-generated explanation goals and strategies, and greater attention to the instructional structure. Improvement in skill acquisition is also strongly related to the generation of explanations connecting the example material to the abstract terms introduced in the text, the generation of explanations that focus on the novel concepts, and spending more time in planning diminishing returns. Finally, reflection on problem solutions that focus on understanding the abstractions underlying programs or that focus on understanding how programs work seems to be related to improved learning.
Note that Mimi Recker was a research scientist at Georgia Institute of Technology when she worked on this article.
Originally published by Taylor & Francis. Abstract available through remote link. Subscription required to access article fulltext.
Note: The second author's name was published as Margaret Recker.
Citation Information
Pirolli, P. & Recker, M. (1994). Learning strategies and transfer in the domain of programming. Cognition and Instruction, 12(3), 235-275.