Skip to main content
Expansion and Contraction in Monopolization Law
Antitrust Law Journal (2010)
  • Michal Gal, University of Haifa
  • Spencer Waller Weber, Loyola University Chicago
  • Avishalom Tor, University of Haifa

This article introduces a special symposium issue of the Antitrust Law Journal based on a conference on monopolization. It argues that monopolization law has been experiencing simultaneous expansion and contraction processes that are not wholly contradictory but at least partly complementary. Specifically, the authors suggest that the contraction of monopolization law in the United States and the EU might serve to facilitate its expansion and increased importance worldwide, providing other antitrust regimes with more focused and effective tools to address the challenges involved in regulating dominant firms. Moreover, monopolization law's increased reach internationally also has made its refinement and rationalization all the more important for jurisdictions seeking to avoid the harmful chilling effects associated with excessive enforcement in this area. Finally, the contraction of monopolization law might also be motivated by external pressures, resulting from spillover effects. A better understanding and evaluation of these expansion and contraction trends is therefore likely to necessitate their joint rather than separate evaluation in future antitrust scholarship.

Publication Date
Citation Information
Michal Gal, Spencer Waller Weber and Avishalom Tor. "Expansion and Contraction in Monopolization Law" Antitrust Law Journal Vol. 76 (2010)
Available at: