Do We Still Need Peer Review? An Argument for Change [Review]Portal: Libraries and the Academy
Document TypeBook Review
AbstractHow long has peer review been in crisis? At what point does crisis outlast emergency to become status quo? Attacks on the weaknesses of peer review appear with such regularity that they have migrated from scholarly journals to newspapers and magazines. Notwithstanding criticism—and bold experiments such as the experimental open peer review given online to Kathleen Fitzpatrick’s 2011 book Planned Obsolescence before its publication—the gears grind on, due in large part to the reward systems built around the mechanism of blind and anonymous review.
Document Object Identifier (DOI)10.1353/pla.2015.0004
Citation InformationHughes, M. (2015). [Review of the book Do We Still Need Peer Review? An Argument for Change, by T. H. P. Gould]. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 15(1), 197-198. doi: 10.1353/pla.2015.0004