Skip to main content
Article
Closing Wall Street’s Commodity and Swaps Betting Parlors: Legal Remedies to Combat Needlessly Gambling Up the Price of Crude Oil Beyond What Market Fundamentals Dictate
Faculty Scholarship
  • Michael Greenberger, University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2013
Keywords
  • oil futures,
  • gasoline prices,
  • futures markets,
  • financial reform,
  • financial derivatives
Abstract
The price of crude oil in the futures markets has oscillated wildly during the past five years. Although these price swings may partly be a result of insufficient supply meeting large demand for oil, economic data demonstrate that market fundamentals have in fact remained in equilibrium. An overwhelming number of market participants, financial analysts, and academics have instead shown that unregulated excessive speculation in the oil futures markets is to blame. Such excessive speculation is a result of the financialization of commodities, which has exacerbated price swings in oil because the speculative upward betting causes artificially high prices that do not reflect actual demand. In order to prevent unstable prices in oil and other commodities, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) and other agencies must strongly enforce measures such as position limits and antimanipulation rules as directed by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Legislative bans on derivative-based gambling on crude oil prices will also help in this regard. These actions will help prevent radically high prices in oil and other commodities and restore those markets to pricing determined by market fundamentals, which will in turn prevent further volatility in crude oil prices that threatens the fragile economic recovery of the United States and the rest of the world.
Publication Citation
81 George Washington Law Review 707 (2013).
Disciplines
Citation Information
81 George Washington Law Review 707 (2013).