Accountability Before the FactNotre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy (2008)
This Essay argues that such a balance is possible if we abandon the notion that "independence" requires that there be no direct role for the public in judicial selection and that "accountability" requires that the public be able
to express its disagreement with judicial rulings by voting the offending judges out of office. The balance suggested here has two elements.
Citation InformationMichael R Dimino. "Accountability Before the Fact" Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy Vol. 22 Iss. 2 (2008) p. 451
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/michael_dimino/21/