The Holocaust at Nuremberg: What the Record RevealsLoyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review (2017)
Historians continue to debate how much of the International Military Tribunal (IMT) proceedings at Nuremberg concerned the Holocaust. The official goal of the Allies in Europe was to end the war by militarily defeating Nazi Germany. Stopping the atrocities was of secondary importance. Once the war ended and the top Nazis were put on trial at Nuremberg, they were not tried for the mass murder of the Jews. Chief Nuremberg prosecutor Justice Robert Jackson announced at trial that the supreme crime committed by the twenty-one German defendants on the dock was the crime of waging aggressive war. This article aims to show that during the IMT trial, the genocide of the Jews—today known by the term Holocaust—was a running theme of the trial. To illustrate the significance of the subject of Jewish persecution at the IMT, the article examines actual testimony and other evidence introduced by the prosecution during each stage of the trial. Those who mine the IMT proceedings will find much about the fate of the Jews in territories under Nazi occupation. The historiography of the Holocaust began at Nuremberg.
- International Military Tribunal,
- Jewish persecution,
- human rights,
- war crimes
Citation InformationMichael J. Bazyler, The Holocaust at Nuremberg: What the Record Reveals, 39 LOY. L.A. INT’L & COMP. L. REV. 35 (2017).