Skip to main content
Article
Infant Responding Under Conjugate vs.Continuous Reinforcemen
Behavior Development Bulletin
  • Michael Voltaire, Nova Southeastern University
  • J.L. Gewirtz
  • M. Pelaez
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2005
Disciplines
Peer Reviewed
1
Abstract
The performance of six human infants (aged 16 to 20 weeks) was compared under a conjugate- versus a continuous- reinforcement schedule. The contingent visual stimulus, a sequence of 5 colored lights, their intensity varying in proportion to response amplitude under the conjugate hut not under the continuous schedule, was presented alone and together with a constant auditory contingent stimulus—chimes placed behind the lights—under both schedules. The target operant response—a foot press of a vertical panel—produced the lights with/without the tinkling chimes. A reversal design counterbalanced with alternating treatments was implemented for each half of the participants. Visual inspection of the graphed-operant frequencies for all six infants, and one-tail binomial tests, showed at p < 0.008 that: (a) the two contingent-stimulus complexes, visual alone and visual-plus auditory, functioned as reinforcers of leg thrusts under both reinforcement schedules; the visual-plus-auditory consequence was a more effective reinforcer for leg-thrust operants than was the visual consequence alone; and, (c) compared to the continuous CRF schedule, the conjugate-reinforcement schedule generated higher peak responding. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)
DOI
10.1037/h0100564
Citation Information
Michael Voltaire, J.L. Gewirtz and M. Pelaez. "Infant Responding Under Conjugate vs.Continuous Reinforcemen" Behavior Development Bulletin Vol. 1 (2005) p. 71 - 79 ISSN: 1942-0722
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/michael-voltaire/18/