Skip to main content
Article
The Judicial Role in Trademark Law
Boston College Law Review (2011)
  • Michael Grynberg, DePaul University
Abstract
This article considers the judicial role in developing trademark law. The issue is important because proposals for trademark reform often rest on expansive conceptions of judicial authority. In thinking about trademark reform, we should broaden our perspective to include considerations of what we want from the law in general. Our answer to the question of what judges applying the Lanham Act should do may vary depending on whether we respond as subjects of trademark law (i.e., as consumers or sellers), as litigants to a trademark action, or as third parties whose focus is not on trademark law, but the general operation of the legal system. Thinking about contested trademark policies in this manner provides an alternative basis for explaining, critiquing, and reforming modern doctrine.
Keywords
  • Trademark,
  • Intellectual Property
Publication Date
Summer July 15, 2011
DOI
https://bclawreview.bc.edu/articles/874
Citation Information
Grynberg, M., The Judicial Role in Trademark Law, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1283 (2011)